KTUGFaq

KTUG FAQ

·Î±×ÀÎ:
ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£:
°¡ÀÔ
It's a poor workman who blames his tools.
FrontPage › CommonLicenses
ÀúÀÛÀÚ°¡ Ưº°È÷ ¶óÀ̼±½º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¾ð±ÞÀ» ÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù¸é ºñ·Ï ÀÎÅÍ³Ý»ó¿¡ ¿Ã·ÁµÐ ¹®¼­¶óÇصµ Àç¹èÆ÷°¡ ±ÝÁöµÈ´Ù°í Çؼ®ÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ´Ù¸¸ °øÁ¤ÀÌ¿ëÀÇ ¹ý¸®»ó °³ÀÎÀû ¿µ¿ª ¾È¿¡¼­´Â ÀÚÀ¯·ÎÀÌ º¹Á¦ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.

LPPL


¿ø·¡ LPPLÀº ¼öÁ¤ÆÇÀÇ ¹èÆ÷¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ÆÄÀÏÀ̸§ º¯°æÀ» ¿ä±¸ÇÏ¿´À¸³ª °³Á¤µÈ 1.3¿¡¼­´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¿ä±¸¸¦ ¹ß°ßÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Ù.

GPL

[http]GNU General Public License [http]GPLÀÇ Çѱ¹¾î ¹ø¿ª ±×·¯³ª Çѱ¹¾î ¹ø¿ªÆÇÀº ¾ÆÁ÷ °ø½ÄÀûÀÎ ¹ýÀû ¹®¼­·Î¼­ÀÇ ÁöÀ§¸¦ ÀÎÁ¤¹ÞÁö ¸øÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù.

ÁÖ¿äƯ¡Àº ¹èÆ÷¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ¼Ò½º°¡ °ø°³µÇ¾î¾ß ÇÏ°í, GPL ÀúÀÛ¹°ÀÇ ÆÄ»ý¹°(¹ýÀûÀ¸·Î´Â 2Â÷Àû ÀúÀÛ¹°À̶ó ºÎ¸¥´Ù)µµ ¿ª½Ã GPL ¶óÀ̼±½º¸¦ ÃëÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù´Â Á¡ÀÌ´Ù.

LGPL


GFDL


BSD


Artistic


Discussion

from comp.text.tex, David Carlisle wrote: LPPL and GPL

Main differences

1) This licences forces a change of file name on modified code
We consider this essential for an implementation that is defining the language of communication as in LaTeX. You can talk of a better implementation of a C compiler, but you can't talk of a better implementation of LaTeX. As I know to my cost, if you add \relax to a latex command, some document, somewhere will break.

You can of course take latex and build a better _something_ just don't call it latex.

GPL does not have this feature.

2) LPPL allows code to be used in essentially all the places that TeX
may be used. This would not be the case for GPL, which could cause problems on some of the commercial TeX systems.

3) GPL has a certain virus quality of forcing all derivatives to
be GPL. LPPL is less aggressive (and actually therefore less secure in some ways) it does not force derivatives to be LPPL, just forces that they are not named to the original filenames.

Apart from that they are just _different_ you can not say that one licence is a supperset of the other. There are some things that you can do under both licences, some just under GPL, some just under LPPL, and things would not be allowed by either licence.

Richard Stallman (author of GPL) has been involved in discussions with this licence (and the original legal.txt one on which it is based) and does accept that this licence qualifies as `free software' in the sense understood by the FSF and the GNU project.


HLaTeXÀÇ ¶óÀ̼¾½º´Â GNU GPL·Î ¸í½ÃµÈ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¾Ð´Ï´Ù.

°³ÀÎÀûÀÎ ÀÇ°ßÀ¸·Î´Â, Àß ¸ð¸£Áö¸¸, HLaTeX ÀÚü´Â GPLÀÌ´õ¶óµµ hangul.sty¿Í hfont.sty, hfont.tex ¿¡ ´ëÇؼ­´Â LPPLÀ̾ú¾î¾ß ÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â°¡, ¶ó´Â °ÍÀε¥, ÀÌ Á¡¿¡ ´ëÇؼ­ ¾îÂî »ý°¢ÇϽôÂÁö ¿©Â庸°í ½Í½À´Ï´Ù. Àº±¤Èñ ¼±»ý´Ô²²¼­ HLaTeXÀ» GPLÀ̶ó ÇϽŠ°ÍÀÌ ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ Àǹ̿¡¼­ "ÀÚÀ¯¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î"¶ó´Â Àǹ̷Π¸»¾¸ÇϽŠ°ÍÀÎÁö ¾Æ´Ï¸é GNU GPLÀÇ (À̸¥¹Ù virus feature±îÁö Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ºñ±³Àû) ¾ö°ÝÇÑ ¹ýÀû ¿ä°ÇÀ» °í·ÁÇϼż­ GPLÀ̶ó ÇϽŠ°ÍÀÎÁö´Â °³ÀÎÀûÀ¸·Î ¿©Â庸¾Æ¾ß°Ú³×¿ä. GPL¿¡¼­ LPPL ÆÄ»ý¹°Àº ¿øÄ¢ÀûÀ¸·Î ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÑ °ÍÀΰ¡¿ä? LPPL¿¡¼­ GPL ÆÄ»ý¹°Àº °¡´ÉÇÑ °ÍÀÌÁö¿ä? ---Karnes
GPLÀ» LPPL·Î ¶óÀ̼±½º º¯°æÇϱâ À§Çؼ­´Â ¿øÀúÀÛÀÚÀÎ Àº±¤Èñ´ÔÀÇ Çã¶ôÀÌ ÀÖ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù°í º¾´Ï´Ù. LPPL¿¡¼­ GPL·Î º¯°æÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº ¿øÀúÀÛÀÚ Çã¶ôÀÌ ¾ø´õ¶óµµ LPPLÀÌ ¿ä±¸ÇÏ´Â ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ ¿ä°ÇÀÌ °®Ãß¾îÁø´Ù¸é °¡´ÉÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ»±î ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¸ðµÎ ÀúÀÇ °³ÀÎÀû ÀÇ°ßÀÏ »Ó, ¹ýÀûÀÎ °á·ÐÀº ¹°·Ð ¾Æ´Õ´Ï´Ù. --DohyunKim

^
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! powered by MoniWiki
last modified 2004-12-29 16:52:24
Processing time 0.0469 sec